Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Jambatan Bengkok

1) Isu jambatan bengkok kembali bergema apabila Duli Yang Maha Mulia Sultan Ibrahim, Sultan Johor bertitah agar kerajaan persekutuan menghidupkan kembali jambatan bengkok yang telah dibatalkan oleh kerajaan ketika di bawah pentadbiran Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi dahulu. Sila klik di sini untuk maklumat lebih lanjut.

2) Aku percaya pandangan Tun Dr. M tersebut bukan bertujuan untuk membalas dendam atau memalukan Pak Lah. Tindakan tersebut dibuat kerana Tun Dr. M dapat melihat kebaikan dan keuntungan yang bakal diperolehi oleh Malaysia dan rakyat Johor khususnya jika projek jambatan tersebut dihidupkan kembali.

3) Aku percaya ramai di kalangan kita sedar tentang peluang dan keuntungan yang bakal diperolehi secara langsung atau tidak langsung hasil daripada pembinaan jambatan tersebut, yang juga dapat meningkatkan kadar persaingan Malaysia dalam menarik pelabur - pelabur asing ke Malaysia. Malah, Malaysia juga akan mendapat manfaat dari faktor alam sekitar.

4) Aku menyokong penuh saranan Tun Dr. Mahathir tersebut, malah Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak harus mempertimbangkan saranan tersebut secara serius kerana aku percaya ramai rakyat Malaysia tidak setuju dengan pembatalan projek jambatan tersebut oleh kerajaan Malaysia terdahulu. Malah parti MCA juga meyokong penuh saranan Duli Yang Maha Mulia Sultan Ibrahim dan Tun Dr. Mahathir, sila klik di sini.  

5) Pada aku, hanya satu saja alasan yang boleh diberikan oleh Datuk Seri Najib, iaitu terdapat perjanjian rahsia diantara beliau dengan Pak Lah jika beliau ingin menjadi PM Malaysia dengan menggantikan Pak Lah, iaitu dengan mengekalkan keputusan pembatalan projek tersebut.

6) Jika sebaliknya, beliau merupakan PM Malaysia yang prihatin dan mendengarkan pandangan rakyat, aku pasti beliau akan memberi pertimbangan sewajarnya untuk kembali menghidupkan projek jambatan bengkok tersebut, malah ianya pasti akan meningkatkan populariti beliau sebagai PM Malaysia.

7) Sebagai rakyat Malaysia yang prihatin, jika projek tersebut dihidupkan kembali, kita akan berpeluang menyaksikan lakonan badut - badut sarkas para menteri - menteri kabinet dahulu yang masih berada dalam kabinet kerajaan sekarang, mahupun yang sudah bersara atau digugurkan yang suatu ketika menyokong keputusan kerajaan terdahulu berhubung pembatalan projek tersebut. Aku pasti para menteri - menteri tersebut akan berpeluh dalam melakonkan sandiwara serta akan terpaksa melakonkan aksi - aksi panas dalam meyokong keputusan kerajaan. Sama - samalah kita saksikan babak - babak dan adegan panas para menteri - menteri tersebut. Untuk itu, marilah kita bersama - sama mendoakan agar kerajaan memberi pertimbangan serius dan akhirnya kembali menghidupkan projek jambatan tersebut, Insyaallah.             

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Tian Chua

1) Peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan Perkara 48(1)(e) jelas menyatakan bahawa seseorang ahli dewan rakyat boleh hilang kerusi dimenanginya jika dihukum penjara tidak kurang daripada 1 tahun atau denda tidak kurang daripada RM2,000.00 dan ia tidak dapat pengampunan.

2) Malah perkara 53 Perlembagaan Persekutuan, juga menyebut bahawa "jika berbangkit apa - apa soal sama ada seorang ahli Majlis Parlimen telah hilang kelayakan menjadi ahli, maka soal itu hendaklah diputuskan oleh Majlis itu dan keputusannya itu adalah muktamat.

3) Manakala peguam Karpal Singh pula lebih jujur dan tepat dalam memberi pandangan beliau berhubung isu tersebut. Beliau telah menyatakan "Jika denda RM2,000.00 beliau habis. Kerusi menjadi kosong. Perlembagaan Persekutuan dengan jelas menyatakan RM2,000.00 atau lebih, anda sudah hilang kelayakan. Tiada hujah lagi dalam soal ini" ujar beliau.

4) Karpal juga merujuk kepada ahli Parlimen Menglembu Fan Yew Ting pada 1975 sebagai kes rujukan, bahawa Speaker Dewan Rakyat telah mengistiharkan bahawa kerusi itu kosong setelah beliau didenda RM2,000.00 ekoran kesalahan di bawah Akta Hasutan. Karpal juga menyatakan, undang - undang itu telah dipinda selepas kes Fan yang membolehkan kelucutan secara automatik apabila seseorang Ahli Parlimen didapati bersalah tanpa perlu melalui Dewan Rakyat.

5) Apa yang aku nampak di sini ialah, Dewan Rakyat seperti takut atau cuba mengelak implikasi perundangan  dan dicop sebagai berat sebelah oleh pihak yang didakwa dengan menyerahkan bulat - bulat tanggungjawabnya kepada pihak Peguam Negara dan SPR untuk membuat keputusan. Sedangkan SPR hanyalah badan yang menjalankan tanggungjawabnya berdasarkan "verdict" yang diputuskan oleh pihak Dewan Rakyat dan pihak Mahkamah.

6) Alasan yang diberikan oleh pihak Dewan Rakyat ialah "Dewan Rakyat tidak perlu membincangkan kes ini, ini adalah kes (kadar denda) yang marginal di mana  kadar yang dikenakan RM2,000.00 (di paras sempadan), lebih elok statusnya ditentukan oleh Peguam Negara". Soalan aku disini, apakah justifikasi Dewan Negara yang menyatakan RM2,000.00 paras sempadan? Sedangkan peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan dengan jelas menyatakan seperti yang telah aku nyatakan di atas.

7) Dewan Rakyat haruslah berani serta tegas dalam melaksanakan tanggungjawabnya. Sudah menjadi adat atau lumrah kepada sesiapa sahaja yang tewas atau di pihak yang kalah untuk tidak menyetujui atau menentangnya. Jadi Dewan Rakyat haruslah tegas melaksanakan tanggungjawabnya kerana peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan jelas membuktikannya. Gagal dalam melaksanakan akan menyebabkan Dewan Rakyat akan dianggap lemah serta bias. Dewan Rakyat juga berkemungkinan akan dilabel sebagai badan yang bias dan lemah di satu pihak yang lain pula.      

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Melayu Kemana

1) Hampir menangis aku kali ini bila membaca posting Tun Dr. Mahathir yang terbaru bertajuk seperti di atas. Sila klik di sini. Aku 100% amat bersetuju dengan pandangan Tun kali ini.

2) Bila terkenangkan nasib yang menimpa orang Melayu ketika ini, boleh disimpulkan bahawa ianya banyak disebabkan oleh sikap orang Melayu itu sendiri. Benar seperti yang diucapkan oleh Tun, bersatu teguh bercerai roboh.

3) Sekali lagi aku ingin tegaskan di sini, bahawa masalah orang Melayu ketika ini juga disebabkan oleh terdapat satu golongan di kalangan orang Melayu, yang kononnya berjaya dalam bidang masing - masing.

4) Mereka ini berpandangan bahawa kejayaan masing - masing adalah disebabkan 100% oleh daya usaha masing - masing. Mereka berpendapat kerajaan tidak pernah membantu mereka sama sekali.

5) Golongan Melayu ini, melabelkan diri mereka sebagai Melayu liberal, yang kononnya berpegang teguh kepada konsep meritokrasi. Kononnya sedia menerima sesiapa sahaja memerintah negara asalkan pemimpin dan parti tersebut berintegriti tinggi dalam melaksanakan tangungjawab masing - masing.

6) Pada aku, golongan Melayu liberal ini sebenarnya merupakan golongan Melayu yang pentingkan diri sendiri, tamak haloba, gila kuasa, sombong, bongkak, berlagak, kurang semangat nasionalis atau kurang semangat patriotik dan beranggapan diri sendiri lebih bijak dari orang lain.

7) Pada aku, mereka ini sudah kurang dan tidak memahami semangat kemerdekaan, kurang memahamani erti kemerdekaan (mengetahui bukan bermakna memahami). Yang pasti di sini, mereka ini adalah golongan yang tidak sedar diri sendiri, yang konon beranggapan lebih bijak dari orang lain yang tanpa disedari, mereka sebenarnya golongan Melayu yang cerdik tidak boleh diajar atau dalam bahasa yang lebih mudah untuk menggambarkan diri mereka ialah BODOH SOMBONG.

8) Mereka ini merupakan penyangak bangsa atau pengkhianat bangsa yang sanggup meracuni pemikiran anak bangsa bagi memenuhi tuntutan diri sendiri. Mereka juga merupakan parasit terhadap pembangunan bangsa dan negara, maka sesuatu harus dilakukan untuk "wipe out" mereka ini dari bumi Malaysia yang tercinta ini. Mungkin peribahasa orang putih yang mengatakan "prevention is better than cure" tidak boleh digunakan lagi. Mungkin pendekatan "cure is better than prevention" perlu dilaksanakan ketika ini. 

9) Bangunlah anak bangsa ku, kita sudah kesuntukan masa. Keluarlah dari "comfort zone" kita, keluarlah berhadapan dengan kenyataan, dengan berdiri teguh dan mempunyai kesedaran diri yang tinggi bahawa orang Melayu adalah bangsa yang berhak ke atas tanah yang tercinta ini, Melayu adalah bangsa yang boleh berdiri sama tinggi dan duduk sama rendah dengan bangsa lain di tanah air yang tercinta ini, hatta juga di luar negara.

10) Seperti juga dengan Tun, aku sedia dilabel sebagai rasis atau "chauvinist" atau apa saja label, kerana niat aku hanyalah satu iaitu untuk memperingati kita semua, sebelum nasi menjadi bubur.

11) Sekian.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

PRU 13

1) PM made a good answer when commenting on Tun Dr. M suggestion that GE should be held soon since Merdeka Centre for Opinion Research latest survey carried out showed that Najib's approval rating had risen to 72% higher than 69% in April 2010.

2) The answer is, cannot call for elections based on one survey opinions. In fact, if we grind through very details on Tun comments, he did said that "it would be good to know who actually conducted the survey".

3) Tun suggestion is mere sarcastic words which normally came out from his mouth. We have to think the other way around in finding his true meaning in his comments. To me Najib really understand the real meaning of Tun point of view. In fact, Najib had even said, the government would not dissolve parliament to make way for general election based on one opinion that people favored him.

4) This have shown that, he is listening to the people view, even it was against his view, which seems have lost for quiet sometimes. It is, one of the key element of Tun Dr. M success in being a PM of Malaysia for 22 years.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Jewish Problem in Europe Before WWII & The Role of Zionism in The Holocaust

1) Jews were given Holy Land by God in order to practicing the Torah without disturbance. But Jews abused the privileged, as a result they were expelled. This can be find exactly from their prayer "Because of our sins we were expelled from our land".

2) God has forsworn to all Jews that "Not to enter the Holy Land before predestined time", "Not to rebel against the nation", to be loyal citizens, not to do anything against the will of any nations or its honour, not to seek vengeance, discord, restitution or compensation, " Not to leave the exile ahead of time", otherwise the redemption will be delayed.

3) The true Judiasm believe, God will send prophet Elijah and Moshiach who will induce all Jews to complete repentance and lead them back to their Holy Land . In this context, we can see clearly that Zionist is not a messiah, Zionist is just a secular nationalistic organisation, which seek to lead Jews back to their Holy Land of Jerusalem or land of Israel, yet Zionism has violated the Torah teaching by saying their fought is religious fought (which also happen in Islam).

4) It is common knowledge that all the sages and saints in Europe during Hitler rise believe, he was a messenger of divine wrath, sent to chasten the Jews because of the bitter apostasy of Zionism against the believe in the eventual messianic redemption.

5) It was believe that Zionism playing big role in participating actively in Jews extermination during WWII. They took liberty of telling the world that they represented the World Jewry.

6) President Roosevelt convened the Evian conference in July 6 - 15, 1938 to deal with Jewish refugee problem. The Jewish agency delegation ignored German offer to allow Jews emigrate to other countries for $250.00 per head, and Zionist made no effort to influence US and 32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German and Austria Jews. On Feb 1, 1940 United Jewish Appeal refused to intervene for a shipload of Jewish refugees stranded on the Danube river.

7) Again in 1941 and 1942, the German Gestapo offered all the European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and occupied France, on conditions that :
  1. None of deportees travel from Spain to Palestine
  2. All the deportees be transported from Spain to US or British colonies, and to there to remain, with entry visas to be arranged by the Jewish living there
  3. $1,000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the agency, payable upon arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of $1,000.00 families daily.
8) The Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti. But, the answer from the Zionist leaders was negative with following comments:
  1. ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees
  2. The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater than the other nations, in order the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war
  3. No ransom will be paid
9) This response to the Gestapo's was made with full knowledge that the alternative to this offer is gas chamber.

10) In 1944, at the time of Hungarian deportations, similiar offer was made, whereby all Hungarian Jewry could be saved. The same Zionist hierarchy refused this offer after the gas chamber had already taken a toll of millions.

11) The British government granted visas to 300 rabbis and their families to the colony of Mauritius, with passage for the evacuees through Turkey. But Jewish Agency leaders sabotaged this plan with the observation that the plan was disloyal to Palestine, and the 300 rabbis and their families should be gassed.

12) In December 17, 1942 both houses of the British Parliament declared its readiness to find temporary refuge for endangered persons. The British Parliament proposed to evacuate 500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany. On January 27 in same year, when the next step were being pursued by over 100 M.P.'s and the Lords, a spokesman for the Zionist announced that the Jews would oppose the motion because Palestine was omitted.

13) On February 16, 1943 Romania offered 70,000 Jewish refugees to leave at the cost of $50.00 each. Again, United Jewish Appeal refused to help, stating that "one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance". On Feb 24, 1943 Stephen Wise, the President of American Jewish Congress and a leader of American Zionist issued a public refusal to this offer and declared no collection of funds would seems justified. In 1944, the Emergency Committee to Save Jewish People called upon the American government to establish a War Refugee Board. Stephen Wise testifying before a special committee of Congress objection to this proposal.

14) These facts are read with consternation and unbearable shame. How can it be explained that a time during  the last phase of the war, when the Nazis were willing to barter Jews for money, partly because of their desires to establish contact with the Western powers which, they believed, were under Jewish influence, how was it possible one asks that the self self-proclaimed "Jewish leaders" did not move heaven and earth to save the last remnant of their brothers?

15) There were many more shocking crimes committed by these abject degenerates known as "Jewish Statesmen", and could list many more example. Can anyone could produce a valid excuse for the above facts.

16) Zionist responsibility for the Holocaust is threefold.

  • The Holocaust was a punishment for disrespecting The Three Oaths
  • Zionist leaders openly withheld support, both financially and otherwise, to save their fellow brothers and sisters from the cruel death.
  • The leaders of Zionist movement cooperated with Hitler and his cohorts on many occasions and in many ways.      
17) In January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for military-political alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical underground "Fighters for Freedom of Israel", better known as Lehi or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical  nationalist "National Military Organization" (Irgun Zvai Leumi - Etzel) over the group's attitude toward Britain, which had affectively banned further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism

18) This remarkable proposal "for the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation on the NMO (Lehi) in the war on the side of Germany "worth quoting at some length, "The NMO which is very fimiliar with the goodwill of the German Reich government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and the Zionist emigration programs take view that:
  • Common interest can exist between a European New Order based on the German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people embodied by the NMO.
  • Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folkish-national Jewry.
  • The establishment of the Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty, with the German Reich, would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of power in the Near East.     
19) On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German Reich government recognized the national aspiration of the Israel Freedom Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part in the war on the side of Germany.

20) This offer by the NMO could include military, political and information activity within Palestine and, after certain organization measures, outside as well. Along with this the "Jewish" men of Europe would be militarily trained and organized in the military units under the leadership and command of the NMO. They would take in combat operations for the purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front be formed.

21) The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with positive-radical solution of the European-Jewish problem on the basis of the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.

22) On the basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionist worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest.

23) The is just one example of the  Zionist movements collaboration with Hitler for the purpose of possibly receiving jurisdiction over the minute piece of earth, Palestine.

24) How far this unbelievable Zionist conspiracy has captured the Jewish masses, and how impossible it is for any different thought to penetrate their minds, even to the point of mere evaluation, can be seen in the vehemence of the reaction to any reproach. With the blinded eyes and closed ears, any voice raised in protest and accusation is immediately suppressed and deafened by the thousandfold cry "Anti Semitism "

*Source from "Jews Against Zionism" which based on "The Wall Street Journal December 2, 1976.